Ask a Vet: Does a Microchip Prove Ownership of a Cat?

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on email
Email

I recently asked the veterinary technicians who work at my office to take X-rays of a cat who had been coughing. The X-rays were compatible with feline asthma.

There also was an incidental finding.

Microchips show up on X-rays as bright white structures that look like rice grains embedded underneath the skin between the shoulders above the chest. They regularly show up in chest radiographs. Two such structures were visible on the X-rays of the cat with asthma. The cat had been microchipped twice.

Double microchipping is quite common. I estimate that I see two microchips in a patient’s X-rays at least once a month. In most cases, both chips are fully functional. A second chip may be placed by a veterinarian or shelter who fails to scan the cat before placing it, or who uses a scanner that is not compatible with the first chip.

Double microchipped cats add a twist to a controversy that has surrounded microchips from the start.

What, exactly, does a microchip prove?

vet-microchip-cat-326616965
Vets put a microchip in a cat by Shutterstock.

Most people assume that a microchip provides definitive proof of ownership of a cat. But if that were the case, who would own the cat if there were two microchips registered to different people?

Several controversies and scandals surrounding microchips have arisen over time. When microchips were first released, some people fervently opposed them because they were afraid that pet microchipping was a first step toward human microchipping and universal government surveillance. I suspect those same people have GPS-enabled cell phones in their pockets right now. For the purpose of government surveillance, microchips are unnecessary and obsolete. That controversy is dead.

Later, a study found a link between microchips and cancer. A furor ensued. However, it was unfounded — it turns out that the link has been proven only in mice that were genetically engineered to be predisposed to cancer. Things are largely quiet on the microchip/cancer front.

Another controversy is well known to veterinarians but not among members of the public. I’m referring to market share wars among companies using competing proprietary technology. For many years most microchip scanners could not read all microchips, potentially leading to euthanasias in shelters who could not identify owners. However, universal chip readers are now available and in wide use. This unnecessary and profit-driven controversy thankfully is largely behind us.

vet-microchip-money-310248686
Business people and money by Shutterstock.

For years, many shelters and humane societies were not scanning stray animals who came through their doors. This shocking scandal has abated as scanning has become the norm (and often is required by law) at shelters across the U.S.

That just leaves one major, simmering controversy.

Does a microchip prove ownership of a pet?

There are two sides to the argument. One side cites the obvious: If a person microchips his pet and registers the chip, he is the likely owner.

The other side counters that things often go wrong in the process. Some cats have two chips that might be registered to different people. Also, the person or organization that registers a microchip often turns out not to be the owner.

For instance, many pets are chipped at shelters. The chips may initially be registered to the shelter. If a person adopts the cat and fails to update the registration he is still the owner, even though the microchip says otherwise.

Other cats might change owners when they are sold, given away, or abandoned. The new owner might fail to update the chip registration.

vet-microchip-adoptapalooza-283665725
Adoptapalooza 2015 by Shutterstock.

And, incredibly, some people might engage in malicious behavior involving microchips. I know of a case in which a vindictive person gave her pet to a friend. The friend did not update the microchip’s registration. The friendship fell apart, and the original (former) owner contacted the microchip company in order to falsely report the pet as stolen. I also have heard of microchip registration abuse during feline custody disputes among divorcing couples.

When it comes to the subject of what microchips prove, there is no shortage of arguing that goes on in veterinary circles. However, from a legal standpoint, things are relatively clear. The Veterinary Information Network’s in-house attorney, Raphael Moore, has stated it unequivocally: In the eyes of the law, microchip registration is nothing more than product registration with a marketing company. On its own it proves nothing. However, it, along with other evidence such as receipts for pet licenses and veterinary bills, can be used in a court proceeding to help establish ownership.

Therefore, in the long run your cat’s microchip might help you if you find yourself in an ownership dispute. And it definitely should help if your cat gets lost and is taken to a vet or shelter by a good Samaritan.

But don’t expect a vet to seize a cat if the cat’s microchip is registered to someone else. Even if a microchip did definitively prove ownership, by law vets can’t seize pets.

Learn more about your cat with Catster:

Got a question for Dr. Barchas? Ask our vet in the comments below and you might be featured in an upcoming column. (Note that if you have an emergency situation, please see your own vet immediately!)

6 thoughts on “Ask a Vet: Does a Microchip Prove Ownership of a Cat?”

  1. My cat has been missing since July 2. And ib been every where looked and talked to so many people and possible look a likes. Yesterday I went to check a response and I know in my heart it was my dexter. Doing the right thing I asked these people to take to check for a chip. They did and it popped up someone else. Can a cat have 2 chips and if so do the scanners pick up both chips?

  2. Hi, so my daughters boyfriend moved his cat into our home in June 2019 , it’s now Feb 2020 because he lived with his dad and the cat could not stay there. He also lived at our house rent free then he cheated on her, dissapeared for two weeks leaving the cat and now wants it back. It has a microchip but the cat lives there now and we paid vet bills etc….what do we do to avoid him trying to take the pet back?

  3. Hi, so my daughters boyfriend moved his cat into our home in June 2019 , it’s now Feb 2020 because he lived with his dad and the cat could not stay there. He also lived at our house rent free then he cheated on her, dissapeared for two weeks leaving the cat and now wants it back. It has a microchip but the cat lives there now and we paid vet bills etc….what do we do to avoid him trying to take the pet back?

  4. In December my friend noticed a cat had been coming into her garden quite frequently, it was skinny and riddled with fleas, requiring some attention and TLC. In January, after seeing the cat outside alone for so long, and it getting skinnier, she deduced it was a stray and took it in.
    She’s had the cat for 3 months now, it settled in wonderfully, the family loves it, it loves them, it’s happier and doing a lot better.
    A couple weeks ago she had a small graze on her chest so my friend took the cat to the vets, the graze was fine, however they scanned for a microchip and found one. The cat was not reported missing. The address it was registered to hadn’t been lived in for the past 3 months, neither of the phone numbers on the chip were answered. They had no reply from these people who obviously didnt care about the cat.
    The vets said “give us the weekend to try and contact them, if we have no luck, you get to keep the cat”
    No reply, the vets said keep it.
    A week later, there was an email reply. The previous owners had split up and the male was supposed to be looking after the cat. He had clearly done a terrible job and not even bothered to mark him missing.
    I have been checking our local Facebook news/ other pages and there have been no posts about the missing cat. The previous owners have shown no care towards this cat. The vets have asked my friend to bring the cat in so the owners can collect him but I feel this is not the best option as they have clearly exhibited they do not care for the cat. The cat has happily settled in with my friend and he has had the opportunity to wander back to his previous address but has decided to stay with my friend. It seems like the cat has made the choice on this one, but what do you think?

    1. The vet can’t make that decision. If the people want the cat back they can take your friend to court but the vet has nothing to do with it. Are let us know what happened.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Get Catster in your inbox!

Stay informed! Get tips and exclusive deals.

Let Catster answer all of your most baffling feline questions!

Starting at just
$14.95!

Related

Follow Us

Shopping Cart