June 5th 2008 11:32 am
Now that the two major party candidates have been chosen, I have been asked to voice my opinion regarding the human political election. The Democrats have chosen Barack Obama, and the Republicans have chosen John McCain. Both are currently Senators, which is interesting from the perspective that the Senate is a representative body, not a governance body. It is not the best preparation for the presidency, but success in the Senate requires the ability to reach across the aisle and build coalitions. It is my theory that the humans are tired of their leaders fighting, and chose those candidates who had demonstrated this skill for compromise and cooperation with success in the Senate, as well as electing candidates who have proven to appeal to their opponents' parties. I would hope that the election proceeds with demonstration of this by careful discussion of the issues and not character assassination.
Now, for my choice -- who is best for cats? If Mr. Obama is better for the economy, with a plan to restore vitality to the US Economy, it would mean more milk in the refrigerator for many cats and their working class families. However, Mr. McCain is savvy on foreign policy, and may be better for national security. If this is a stark decision between morning milk and safe naps in sun patches on the floor, I choose both. I think we should elect Mr. Obama and name Mr. McCain to the Secretary of Defense. Problem solved.
- Betram Ocelot (hey, I have the same initials as my next president!)
|
My Account
close
